Enfilant les méandres inattendus et

Enfilant les méandres inattendus et les étapes saugrenues, Benjamin, cet adorateur des mots – et de leur exactitude –, doit se résoudre à admettre ce qui se présente comme une évidence : il n’y a ni passé ni présent, et notre propre vie, comme une langue, ne nous appartient pas. Pierre Samson, dans un style truculent, prend à contrepied le roman contemporain qui « cherche par tous les moyens possibles à vous transporter d’un point A à un point B », arguant que l’intérêt réside justement entre ce A et ce B. Sinon, « pourquoi relire un livre ? »

Résultats (Anglais) 1:

Sliding the unexpected twists and turns and the preposterous steps, Benjamin, this words - and their accuracy - worshiper, must resolve to admit what presents itself as an obvious fact: there is no neither past nor present, and our own lives, as a language, does not belong to us. Pierre Samson, earthy style, takes to contrast the contemporary novel that "seeks by all means possible to transport you from point A to point B", arguing that the interest lies between A and B. Otherwise, "why read a book? ''

Résultats (Anglais) 2:

Threading the unexpected twists and turns and ridiculous steps, Benjamin, this worshiper of words - and accuracy - must resolve to admit what is as obvious: there is neither past nor present, and our own lives, as a language, not ours. Pierre Samson, in a truculent style, takes the opposite view contemporary novel which "seeks by all possible means to transport you from point A to point B," arguing that the interest lies precisely between the A and B. Otherwise, "why read a book? "

Résultats (Anglais) 3:

the twists and turns and unexpected step into wild, benjamin, the lexus, and the accuracy of words, is to admit it is an obvious fact: there is no past, present, and to our own lives, as a language, does not belong to us. peter samson, earthy style.to view the contemporary novel, which is by all means possible to transport you from point a to point b ", arguing that the value lies between a and b. if not," why read a book? "